Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on duty-paid plastic granules used to manufacture blow-moulded tubes and lay flat tubings, which were then used in the manufacture of slurry explosives, and whether the intermediate stage or the packaging-material description barred credit.
Analysis: The scheme of Rule 57A allows credit of duty on goods used in or in relation to the manufacture of final products. The expression "input" in the Explanation is of enlarged scope and the specific inclusion of packaging materials does not narrow the main rule so as to confine credit only to packaging materials themselves. The plastic granules were used to manufacture the tubes and tubings, and those products were in turn used in the manufacture of the final explosives. The fact that the intermediate goods may be exempt or that they form part of the end product did not defeat the credit, and the situation was also covered by Rule 57D. The permission for job-work and the notification relied upon supported the respondents' position.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible to the respondents, and the Department's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Under Rule 57A, credit is available on goods used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product, and the inclusive reference to packaging materials does not exclude credit on inputs merely because they are first used to make intermediate goods.