Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on HDPE granules used in the manufacture of blow moulded tubes for packing slurry explosives.
Analysis: Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 allows credit on goods used in or in relation to the manufacture of final products, and the concept of inputs includes packaging material. The decisive question is whether the goods are used in or in relation to manufacture, not whether they are to be characterised as packaging material or raw material for packaging material. The blow moulded tubes had no separate existence apart from the explosives, formed an integral part of the final product, and were used up in the blasting operation. Applying the marketability and component-part test, the materials used to produce such integral components were treated as used in the manufacture of the final product.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on the HDPE granules, and the disallowance was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the assessee was held entitled to the credit and consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a material is used to make an integral component of the final product and that component has no independent existence apart from the final product, the material is regarded as used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product for Modvat purposes.