Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether 3-Dimethylamine-1-Chloropropane HCl 50% aqueous solution, being a stabilised form of 3-Dimethylamine-1-Chloropropane, was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 179/86.
Analysis: The imported product fell under Chapter 29. Note 1(f) of Chapter 29 treated products with an added stabiliser necessary for preservation or transport as continuing to fall within the chapter. The evidence on record, including technical certificates, showed that the hydrochloric acid was added only to stabilise an unstable organic base and that the imported item was essentially the same as 3-Dimethylamine-1-Chloropropane. In such circumstances, the notification could not be read so narrowly as to exclude the stabilised form when the underlying product remained the same and the stabiliser was only for preservation.
Conclusion: The imported goods were covered by Sl. No. 10 of Notification No. 179/86 and the exemption was admissible.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded and the denial of exemption was set aside, with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: A product that remains commercially and chemically the same as the item specified in an exemption notification does not lose the benefit merely because it contains an added stabiliser necessary for preservation or transport.