Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods manufactured by the appellants were maleic resins within the meaning of Notification No. 70/84 and therefore entitled to exemption.
Analysis: The product was not in dispute as to its tariff classification, but the controversy was whether the presence of phthalic anhydride excluded it from the notification. The expression "maleic resins including fumeric resins" in the notification covered synthetic resins manufactured by reacting maleic acid or maleic anhydride with specified components and included chemically modified maleic resins, while excluding only blends with other artificial or synthetic resins. The chemical examiner's opinion could not determine classification or exemption eligibility by itself. On the evidence of the affidavits of qualified experts, phthalic anhydride was used as a modifier to control gelation and improve stability, and the goods were chemically modified maleic resins. The Revenue did not rebut that evidence or show that the goods were blends excluded by the notification.
Conclusion: The goods were held to be maleic resins within Notification No. 70/84 and the exemption was available to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where expert evidence shows that a resin product is a chemically modified maleic resin and it is not proved to be a blend excluded by the exemption notification, it falls within the notified description and is entitled to exemption.