Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Foley Balloon Catheters were to be treated as Suction Catheters for purposes of OGL clearance and entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 208/81-Cus., dated 22nd September, 1981.
Analysis: The goods imported were Foley Balloon Catheters. The controversy had already been examined in earlier Tribunal decisions on the same product, and those decisions had been followed by the Bombay High Court. The Tribunal noted that the earlier view, supported by medical certificates and trade understanding, had held Foley Balloon Catheters to be Suction Catheters eligible for clearance under OGL and for exemption under the notification. Faced with divergent expert opinions and no distinguishing factual feature, the Tribunal applied the principle that a coordinate Bench decision should be followed in similar matters. It also applied the settled rule that where interpretation of a fiscal enactment is open to doubt, the construction favourable to the assessee should be adopted.
Conclusion: Foley Balloon Catheters were held to fall within the relevant import description and were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 208/81-Cus., dated 22nd September, 1981.