Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claims were barred by limitation where the duty on the goods had been paid under provisional assessment and the assessment was treated as provisional for all purposes.
Analysis: The Tribunal applied the principle that, in cases of provisional assessment, the relevant date for limitation is the date of adjustment of duty after finalisation of the assessment. It relied on the view that provisional assessment is an integrated process and cannot be compartmentalised by separating valuation from classification for the purpose of refund limitation. The Tribunal followed the majority view in the cited precedent and rejected the contention that provisional assessment limited to valuation would not extend to a refund claim based on rate of duty or classification.
Conclusion: The refund claims were not time-barred, and the assessee was entitled to refund.