Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cess was payable separately on sacking cloth captively consumed in the manufacture of bags when cess had already been paid on the bags cleared.
Analysis: The dispute concerned levy of cess under the Jute Manufactures Cess Rules, 1976 framed under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. The deciding principle was that where hessian and sacking were captively used for manufacture of bags and cess had already been discharged on the bags cleared, there was no warrant for a separate cess demand on the intermediate sacking cloth. The reasoning followed the earlier Tribunal view applying the same statutory scheme and rejecting the department's attempt to distinguish the period involved.
Conclusion: Separate cess on the captively consumed sacking cloth was not payable and the demand could not be sustained.