Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether artificial teeth manufactured from duty-paid plastic materials and classifiable under Tariff Item 68 were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 182/82 dated 11-5-1982 as articles made of plastics.
Analysis: The notification exempted articles made of plastics falling under Tariff Item 68 when produced out of artificial resins or plastic materials falling under Tariff Item 15A(1) on which duty or additional duty had already been paid. The wording did not restrict the scope of the expression "articles" by reference to general use or any particular end-use. Since the manufactured artificial teeth satisfied both requirements, the restrictive view taken by the lower authority was not justified. In view of this conclusion, it was unnecessary to examine the separate claim based on Notification No. 234/82.
Conclusion: The artificial teeth were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 182/82, and the appeal succeeded.