TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal remands appeal for new hearing, no bond needed as duty paid in cash.</h1> <h3>KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LTD. Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS</h3> KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS LTD. Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS - 1990 (45) E.L.T. 580 (Tribunal) The appellants imported Roller Bearings below 85 mm and claimed benefit of Notification No. 179/80-Cus. The Assistant Collector rejected their refund claim for non-filing of D.G.T.D. and End Use affidavit. The Collector of Customs (Appeals) also rejected the appeal for not furnishing a bond. The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter for de novo adjudication, stating no bond was necessary as full duty was paid in cash.
TaxTMI 