<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 208 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80067</link>
    <description>Where an importer had already paid the full duty in cash, the Tribunal held that the bond condition in Notification No. 179/80-Cus. was not attracted and need not be insisted upon. On the separate issue concerning correlation of the original D.G.T.D. certificate, the Tribunal directed fresh consideration by way of de novo adjudication by the Assistant Collector in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:40:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 208 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80067</link>
      <description>Where an importer had already paid the full duty in cash, the Tribunal held that the bond condition in Notification No. 179/80-Cus. was not attracted and need not be insisted upon. On the separate issue concerning correlation of the original D.G.T.D. certificate, the Tribunal directed fresh consideration by way of de novo adjudication by the Assistant Collector in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>