Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeals against additions for earlier assessment years survived for adjudication after the corporate debtor underwent CIRP, liquidation, sale as a going concern, and closure of liquidation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: The corporate debtor had been admitted to CIRP under Section 7, liquidation was ordered under Section 33, and the resolution professional was appointed liquidator under Section 34. The liquidation process culminated in a sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern under the liquidation framework, with the successful bidder depositing the full consideration and the NCLT granting consequential reliefs. The NCLT further recognised that pre-transfer liabilities were to be dealt with within the liquidation mechanism under the statutory waterfall under Section 53, and subsequently ordered closure of liquidation. As these judicial orders were neither stayed nor set aside, the appellate proceedings under the Income Tax Act could not proceed on a factual and legal footing inconsistent with the completed IBC process.
Conclusion: No effective adjudication survived against the corporate debtor in its present form, and the appeals were held to have become infructuous.