Reverse charge limitation and service classification failed where revenue neutrality and missing taxable ingredients defeated the demands.

Extended limitation under service tax was held unavailable on reverse charge liability where the dispute was revenue neutral and no intent to evade was shown, so the earlier-period demand was set aside. Amounts booked for labour, repair and maintenance, and freight and cartage were not automatically classifiable as manpower supply, works contract, or goods transport agency service absent the legal ingredients of those taxable entries; the corresponding demands were set aside. The labour component required limited factual verification to determine whether one person collected receipts on behalf of multiple labourers and acted as manpower supplier. If tax became payable on that basis, refund would be available in cash under the transitional GST provision, and the matter was remanded only for that issue.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the demand for the earlier period could be sustained by invoking the extended period of limitation on a reverse charge liability where the case was revenue neutral; (ii) whether the amounts booked towards labour, repair and maintenance, and freight and cartage could be classified respectively as manpower supply service, works contract service, and goods transport agency service for reverse charge levy; (iii) whether the disputed labour component required factual verification and, if service tax became payable, refund would follow under the transitional GST provision.

Issue (i): whether the demand for the earlier period could be sustained by invoking the extended period of limitation on a reverse charge liability where the case was revenue neutral.

Analysis: The normal limitation under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 governs service tax demands, and the extended period is available only on fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or deliberate evasion. Where the liability arises on reverse charge and the assessee could immediately avail CENVAT credit, the demand is revenue neutral and the element of intent to evade is absent.

Conclusion: The demand for the earlier period was unsustainable and the order confirming it was set aside in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): whether the amounts booked towards labour, repair and maintenance, and freight and cartage could be classified respectively as manpower supply service, works contract service, and goods transport agency service for reverse charge levy.

Analysis: Payments for executing work contracts to contractors cannot, by themselves, be treated as manpower supply. Pure repair work and purchases do not constitute works contract service, and reverse charge cannot be fastened without the legal ingredients of the taxable entry. Likewise, transport-related expenditure does not attract goods transport agency tax unless a consignment note is issued. On these heads, the demand was not sustainable.

Conclusion: The demands under works contract service and goods transport agency service were set aside, while the manpower supply classification was rejected except for the labour component requiring verification, in favour of the assessee.

Issue (iii): whether the disputed labour component required factual verification and, if service tax became payable, refund would follow under the transitional GST provision.

Analysis: The material concerning receipts collected by one person on behalf of several labourers required verification to determine whether that person acted as the manpower supplier. If any tax became payable on that basis, the amount would be refundable in cash under Section 142(7)(b) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded only to that limited extent, with the corresponding demand and penalty otherwise set aside, in favour of the assessee in part.

Final Conclusion: The earlier appeals were allowed and the later appeal was partly sent back for limited factual verification, with the remaining demands and penalty relief granted to the assessee.

---