Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made on account of cash deposits and other credits in the assessee's bank account under section 69A of the Income-tax Act could be sustained in full, or whether only a reasonable profit element was taxable.
Analysis: The assessee was engaged in tobacco and the disputed bank entries were linked to business transactions. A coordinate bench in the assessee's own case for an earlier year had already restricted similar additions to 10% of the deposits after noting that the transactions were routed through the bank account and that the entire receipts could not be treated as income without allowing set-off for purchases. Following that view, and in the absence of any contrary material from the Revenue, the Tribunal held that the same approach should apply for the year in appeal.
Conclusion: The addition was not sustained in full. The Tribunal restricted the disallowance to 10% of the cash deposits and other credits, thereby granting partial relief to the assessee.