Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the service tax appeal filed before the Commissioner (Appeals) was within limitation or within the condonable period, and whether rejection of the appeal as time-barred was justified.
Analysis: The limitation for filing the appeal under Section 85(3A) of the Finance Act, 1994 is prescribed in months, not days. The period of two months therefore runs by calendar months and, on the facts, expired on 16.05.2021. The further one-month condonable period expired on 16.06.2021, which was the very date on which the appeal was presented. The appeal was thus filed within the condonable period, and the explanation for delay was found acceptable.
Conclusion: The rejection of the appeal as time-barred was unsustainable, the delay was condoned, and the matter was remitted to the Commissioner (Appeals) for decision on merits.