Mandatory arrest safeguards were enforced where vague reasons, missing DIN and mechanical remand made detention unsustainable in law.

Arrest, detention and remand under the Central Excise Act were treated as illegal where the record showed no clear compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards. The Court noted an uncontroverted assertion that DIN had not been generated on departmental documents, vague and evasive reasons to believe, absence of the Commissioner's seal or signature on the grounds of arrest and reasons to believe, and no clear material showing that family members were informed. It also found the remand order to have been passed mechanically without due application of mind. The plea that these safeguards were merely directory was rejected, and the arrest, detention and remand were held unsustainable in law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the arrest, detention and remand of the petitioner under the Central Excise Act were illegal for want of compliance with the requirements relating to DIN, recording of reasons to believe, service of arrest grounds, and proper judicial application of mind while granting remand.

Analysis: The Court found that the writ petition contained a specific assertion regarding non-generation of DIN on departmental documents, which was not specifically denied. No material was produced to show compliance with the departmental guidelines in that regard. The reasons to believe placed on record were found to be vague and evasive, and neither the grounds of arrest nor the reasons to believe bore the seal or signature of the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner. The Court also noticed the absence of clear material showing compliance with the statutory requirement of informing the family members and found that the remand order appeared to have been passed mechanically without due application of mind. The plea that the statutory safeguards were not mandatory was rejected.

Conclusion: The arrest, detention and remand were held to be illegal and unsustainable in law, and the petitioner was directed to be released forthwith unless wanted in any other case.

Ratio Decidendi: Arrest and remand that are supported by vague or unauthenticated reasons, without demonstrated compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards and without judicial application of mind, are illegal and cannot be sustained.

---