Customs release conditions cannot override a criminal court's custody order; excessive security deposit set aside.

Section 110A of the Customs Act allows release of seized goods, documents or things on a bond with security and conditions fixed by the Customs Commissioner, but that discretion cannot be used to defeat a lawful criminal court order directing release on specified terms. A condition requiring a security deposit of at least 30% of the vehicle's value was set aside because it would frustrate the court's custody order. Release was directed on execution of the bond fixed by the criminal court.

---

---

Issues: Whether the customs authority could insist on a security deposit equivalent to 30% of the vehicle's value for release of a seized vehicle when the criminal court had directed release on execution of a bond.

Analysis: Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962 permits release of seized goods, documents or things pending adjudication on a bond with such security and conditions as the Commissioner of Customs may require. The provision empowers the customs authority to impose release conditions, but that discretion cannot be exercised in a manner that nullifies or frustrates a lawful order of a criminal court granting custody on specified terms.

Conclusion: The condition requiring a security deposit of not less than 30% of the value of the vehicle was set aside, and release was directed on execution of a bond of Rs.30,00,000/-.

Final Conclusion: The petitioner succeeded to the extent that the additional security condition was invalidated and the seized vehicle was ordered to be released on the bond fixed by the criminal court.

Ratio Decidendi: Statutory discretion to impose conditions for release of seized goods cannot be used to defeat or override a lawful judicial order granting release on specified terms.

---