Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cenvat credit availed on NPCI e-statements/documents was admissible, and whether the Revenue could disallow the credit for alleged non-compliance with the prescribed documentary requirements.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the same issue had already been decided in the respondent's own case in its favour and that the Department had accepted the earlier decision in a similar matter. It relied on the earlier reasoning that NPCI functions as an intermediary network service provider for banking transactions, that the banking company proviso to Rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 relaxes the normal invoice requirements, and that the NPCI document contained the necessary particulars for availment of credit. The Tribunal found no basis to depart from the earlier view and accepted the settled position on admissibility of credit.
Conclusion: The cenvat credit on NPCI e-statements/documents was held admissible, and the Revenue's challenge failed.