<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1103 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793722</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on NPCI e-statements/documents was treated as admissible where NPCI acted as an intermediary network service provider for banking transactions and the document contained the particulars needed for credit. The Tribunal relied on its earlier decision in the same assessee&#039;s case, which the Department had accepted in a similar matter, and held that the banking company proviso to Rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 relaxed the ordinary invoice requirements. On that basis, the documentary objection for alleged non-compliance did not justify disallowance of the credit, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 13:30:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1103 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793722</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on NPCI e-statements/documents was treated as admissible where NPCI acted as an intermediary network service provider for banking transactions and the document contained the particulars needed for credit. The Tribunal relied on its earlier decision in the same assessee&#039;s case, which the Department had accepted in a similar matter, and held that the banking company proviso to Rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 relaxed the ordinary invoice requirements. On that basis, the documentary objection for alleged non-compliance did not justify disallowance of the credit, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>