Natural justice in bankruptcy proceedings requires a real chance to file objections before an order is made.

An order initiating bankruptcy proceedings was found vulnerable where the appellant appeared on the hearing date but was not given an effective opportunity to file objections before the matter was reserved and decided. The decisive issue was procedural fairness: the record did not show compliance with audi alteram partem or the requirement of a meaningful chance to controvert the application. The substantive correctness of the bankruptcy conclusion was not examined. The order was quashed for breach of natural justice, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after granting an opportunity to file objections.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order initiating bankruptcy proceedings was liable to be quashed for violation of the principles of natural justice and denial of an effective opportunity to file objections.

Analysis: The Appellant entered appearance on the hearing date, but no opportunity was afforded to file objections before the application was reserved and decided. The record did not show that the Appellant was given any effective chance to controvert the application before the impugned order was passed. The validity of the ultimate conclusion on bankruptcy was not the point in issue; the decisive question was whether the procedure adopted satisfied audi alteram partem and the requirement of fairness under the applicable procedural framework.

Conclusion: The order was vitiated for breach of natural justice and was quashed, with the matter remitted for fresh consideration after granting the Appellant an opportunity to file objections.

---