Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment under the Income-tax Act, 1961 is invalid when the assessee has filed a return in response to notice under section 148 but the Assessing Officer fails to issue notice under section 143(2) before completing the reassessment.
Analysis: The assessee had originally filed a return under section 139(1) and later filed a return in response to notice under section 148. The Tribunal held that the belated filing could not be treated as non-est so as to dispense with the statutory requirement of notice under section 143(2). Relying on the principle that once a return is filed in response to section 148, the Assessing Officer must follow the reassessment procedure contemplated by sections 142 and 143(2), the Tribunal found that non-issuance of the jurisdictional notice was not a curable irregularity. The Tribunal also treated the reassessment as unsustainable in light of the binding precedents applied to similar facts.
Conclusion: Notice under section 143(2) was mandatory in the facts of the case, and the reassessment completed without such notice was invalid and void ab initio.