Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the mortgagor could invoke Order 34 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to redeem the mortgage during execution of an order of sale passed under Sections 31 and 32 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, notwithstanding confirmation of sale and pending appeals.
Analysis: The relevant scheme under Sections 31 and 32 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 was treated as a special execution procedure, but Section 32(8) required the sale to be carried out, as far as practicable, in the manner provided in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for execution of a decree. The Court held that this incorporated the ordinary execution incidents applicable to a decree for sale of mortgaged property, including the right under Order 34 Rule 5, unless its application was impracticable. The pendency of appeals against the order confirming or setting aside the sale meant that the sale had not attained irrevocable finality, and the mortgagor's right of redemption had not been extinguished under the proviso to Section 60 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The statutory scheme contained no provision inconsistent with that right, and the legal fiction in Section 32(8) could validly extend to the execution process for applying the relevant Code provisions.
Conclusion: The application under Order 34 Rule 5 was maintainable and entitled the mortgagor to redeem the mortgage. The appeals were allowed and the subsequent auction sale was set aside.