Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate authority could disallow the assessee's claim of deduction on interest income, even though the claim had already been allowed in rectification and no ground or notice of enhancement had been issued; and whether such interest income was deductible under section 80P(2)(d).
Analysis: The rectification order under section 154 read with section 143(1) had already allowed the deduction claimed on the interest income. The assessee had not raised any ground on this aspect before the appellate authority, yet the appellate authority proceeded to decide the matter against the assessee without issuing any notice of enhancement. Such adjudication was beyond the scope of appellate jurisdiction and contrary to natural justice. On merits, interest earned from investments with co-operative banks was held to qualify for deduction under section 80P(2)(d).
Conclusion: The disallowance of deduction on the interest income was not sustainable and was directed to be deleted.