<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 269 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792888</link>
    <description>An appellate authority cannot disallow an already-allowed deduction on interest income when no ground was raised by the assessee and no notice of enhancement was issued; doing so exceeds appellate jurisdiction and breaches natural justice. On merits, interest earned from investments with co-operative banks is stated to qualify for deduction under section 80P(2)(d). The resulting disallowance of the deduction was therefore unsustainable and was directed to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 08:07:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 269 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792888</link>
      <description>An appellate authority cannot disallow an already-allowed deduction on interest income when no ground was raised by the assessee and no notice of enhancement was issued; doing so exceeds appellate jurisdiction and breaches natural justice. On merits, interest earned from investments with co-operative banks is stated to qualify for deduction under section 80P(2)(d). The resulting disallowance of the deduction was therefore unsustainable and was directed to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>