Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment initiated under sections 147 and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid where the recorded reasons were based on information from the Insight Portal and Investigation Wing, but did not disclose adequate material linkage, and whether the consequent reassessment order could be sustained.
Analysis: The reassessment was examined on the touchstone of the recorded reasons alone. The reasons were found to be founded substantially on departmental information regarding alleged fictitious profit and penny stock transactions, but they did not adequately disclose the tangible material, transaction particulars, or the live link required to form an independent reason to believe that income had escaped assessment. The formation of belief was treated as having been made without sufficient independent application of mind and on borrowed satisfaction. Since the very basis of reopening was found unsustainable, the merits of the disallowances did not survive for adjudication.
Conclusion: The reassessment proceedings were held invalid and the consequent reassessment order was quashed; the assessee succeeded.