Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment proceedings initiated by the erstwhile Assessing Officer were invalid for want of jurisdiction after transfer of the assessee's case under section 127 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether the additions on merits could survive once the reassessment was held void.
Analysis: The jurisdiction over the assessee had already been transferred by an order under section 127 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. After such transfer, the original Assessing Officer became functus officio and had no authority to issue notice under section 148 or complete reassessment under section 143(3) read with section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Since assumption of jurisdiction is a condition precedent, the reassessment initiated and completed by the officer lacking jurisdiction was held to be without authority of law and void ab initio. Once the reassessment was quashed, the additions made in the assessment did not survive for adjudication.
Conclusion: The reassessment proceedings were invalid for want of jurisdiction, and the consequential additions became academic.