Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid where the assessee had already been assessed on the basis that the business consisted of accommodation entries and the same purchases were again sought to be taxed on the basis of subsequent information.
Analysis: The assessment record showed that, in the original proceedings, the assessee's purchases and sales were treated as bogus and commission income was estimated on the sales turnover. Later information from the Sales Tax Department led to another reopening on the same set of purchases, and parallel reassessment proceedings had already resulted in disallowance of those very purchases. On these facts, the assessment authority held that the assessee was being subjected to tax on the same turnover more than once and that no real income had escaped assessment. It was also accepted that commission income, in such circumstances, could be estimated only on the sales turnover and not again on the purchase turnover.
Conclusion: Reopening under section 147 was invalid, the impugned assessment was quashed, and the addition based on commission on purchase turnover did not survive.