Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revenue's miscellaneous application for rectification of mistake was maintainable and whether the final order dated 22.11.2024 required recall on account of apparent errors and incomplete consideration of mutuality.
Analysis: The Tribunal found that the impugned order had not properly examined the issue of mutuality and that an obvious factual error had crept in inasmuch as the order referred to page numbers 84 to 86 of the Order-in-Original though no such pages existed. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the errors as mistakes apparent from the record rather than an attempt at review and concluded that the order suffered from sufficient apparent infirmities to justify rectification.
Conclusion: The rectification application was allowed and the final order dated 22.11.2024 was recalled, in favour of the revenue.
Final Conclusion: The earlier final order stood set aside for fresh consideration in consequence of the apparent mistakes noticed by the Tribunal.