<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 870 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791668</link>
    <description>A rectification application under the mistake-apparent-from-record jurisdiction was treated as maintainable where the Tribunal identified an incomplete examination of mutuality and a factual error in the order&#039;s reference to non-existent page numbers in the Order-in-Original. The Tribunal held these defects to be apparent infirmities rather than a prohibited review of its earlier decision. On that basis, it allowed the application, recalled the final order dated 22.11.2024, and directed fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 09:15:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 870 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791668</link>
      <description>A rectification application under the mistake-apparent-from-record jurisdiction was treated as maintainable where the Tribunal identified an incomplete examination of mutuality and a factual error in the order&#039;s reference to non-existent page numbers in the Order-in-Original. The Tribunal held these defects to be apparent infirmities rather than a prohibited review of its earlier decision. On that basis, it allowed the application, recalled the final order dated 22.11.2024, and directed fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>