Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made towards cash deposits during the demonetization period under section 69A was sustainable in full, or whether the assessee's explanations and supporting material warranted partial relief.
Analysis: The assessee produced cash flow statements, bank statements, land records, and material relating to agricultural income, salary income, withdrawals, and past cash balance to explain the source of deposits. The Tribunal found that these materials were not properly examined by the lower authorities and that the assessee had shown some basis for the availability of cash. At the same time, it held that some of the supporting documents were self-serving and did not justify complete deletion of the addition. Balancing the material on record and the possibility of revenue leakage, the Tribunal restricted the addition by adopting 10% of the disputed amount as taxable income.
Conclusion: The addition was not sustained in full and was reduced to Rs. 68,000, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.