<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 463 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791261</link>
    <description>Cash deposits during the demonetisation period were examined under section 69A against the assessee&#039;s cash flow statements, bank records, land documents, agricultural income material, salary evidence, withdrawals and past cash balance. The Tribunal found that the lower authorities had not properly examined this supporting material and accepted that there was some basis for availability of cash. However, it also treated parts of the evidence as self-serving and insufficient to justify complete deletion of the addition. On that record, the Tribunal granted partial relief by restricting the addition to 10% of the disputed amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 07:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 463 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791261</link>
      <description>Cash deposits during the demonetisation period were examined under section 69A against the assessee&#039;s cash flow statements, bank records, land documents, agricultural income material, salary evidence, withdrawals and past cash balance. The Tribunal found that the lower authorities had not properly examined this supporting material and accepted that there was some basis for availability of cash. However, it also treated parts of the evidence as self-serving and insufficient to justify complete deletion of the addition. On that record, the Tribunal granted partial relief by restricting the addition to 10% of the disputed amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>