Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned adjudication order confirming the GST demand and denying transitional input tax credit required interference and remand for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The dispute concerned transitional input tax credit claimed in respect of stock available on 30.06.2017 under Section 140 of the GST regime. The Court noted that the assessee had asserted prior replies and the availability of stock, but the adjudicating authority had not undertaken the necessary verification, including comparison with the relevant return data and supporting material. In the absence of such exercise, the demand confirmation could not be sustained as a final adjudication on merits. The Court therefore directed de novo consideration, with the assessee to deposit 25% of the disputed tax, file a reply with documents, and be granted a personal hearing.
Conclusion: The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication on merits, subject to compliance with the directed pre-deposit and filing of reply and documents.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition resulted in a conditional remand for reconsideration of the GST demand and transitional credit claim, with consequential interim attachment relief linked to compliance.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a GST demand involving transitional credit is confirmed without proper verification of stock, replies, and supporting return data, the adjudication is liable to be set aside and remitted for fresh decision after due hearing.