<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1332 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790263</link>
    <description>Transitional input tax credit under the GST regime for stock held on 30.06.2017 required proper verification of the assessee&#039;s replies, supporting documents and return data before confirmation of demand. The High Court found that the adjudicating authority had not undertaken that necessary examination, so the demand confirmation could not stand as a final merits determination. The matter was remitted for de novo adjudication, with directions for the assessee to deposit 25% of the disputed tax, file a reply with documents, and be afforded a personal hearing. Interim attachment relief was linked to compliance with those directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:47:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1332 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790263</link>
      <description>Transitional input tax credit under the GST regime for stock held on 30.06.2017 required proper verification of the assessee&#039;s replies, supporting documents and return data before confirmation of demand. The High Court found that the adjudicating authority had not undertaken that necessary examination, so the demand confirmation could not stand as a final merits determination. The matter was remitted for de novo adjudication, with directions for the assessee to deposit 25% of the disputed tax, file a reply with documents, and be afforded a personal hearing. Interim attachment relief was linked to compliance with those directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>