Bail cancellation requires strong supervening grounds; mere need for further custody does not justify revoking liberty.

Bail cancellation requires cogent and overwhelming circumstances, such as breach of conditions, abuse of liberty, absconding risk, or interference with evidence or witnesses. On the material recorded, the accused had complied with bail conditions, cooperated with investigation, attended when called, supplied documents and login credentials, and had previously travelled abroad under conditions and returned, with passport surrender also noted. No credible material showed misuse of liberty or any supervening circumstance warranting cancellation. The court also treated the bail order as reasoned and held that a request for further custodial interrogation did not justify depriving the accused of liberty. The prayer for cancellation of bail was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether the bail granted to the respondent accused should be cancelled on the ground of alleged breach of bail conditions, need for further custodial interrogation, and alleged infirmity in the order granting bail.

Analysis: Cancellation of bail requires cogent and overwhelming circumstances, ordinarily showing interference with the administration of justice, evasion of process, abuse of liberty, absconding risk, or tampering with evidence or witnesses. The material on record showed that the respondent had complied with the conditions imposed by the trial court, had been permitted to travel abroad on earlier occasions with conditions, had returned, and had even surrendered his passport before it was later returned by the trial court. The record also indicated cooperation with the investigating agency, attendance when called, and supply of documents and login credentials. No credible material was placed to show breach of bail conditions, misuse of liberty, or any supervening circumstance justifying cancellation. The order granting bail was also treated as reasoned, and the request for further custodial interrogation was held not to furnish a sufficient ground to take away liberty already granted.

Conclusion: The prayer for cancellation of bail was rejected and the respondent's bail was not disturbed.

---