Foundational Findings must sustain disciplinary charges; absent supporting charges, consequential penalties cannot be maintained.

Imposition of a disciplinary penalty under Regulation 18 was challenged on the ground that the finding of violation of Regulation 10(m) lacked a sustained evidentiary foundation; related primary charges that supported the 10(m) finding were dropped by the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal examined the record, communications and the authority's lenient treatment of the importer (including re export permission) and concluded the foundation for sustaining Regulation 10(m) was absent. Consequently, a penalty imposed as a consequential measure for a related regulatory breach could not be maintained, and the penalty was set aside with consequential relief.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imposition of penalty of Rs.10,000/- under Regulation 18 of the Custom Broker Licensing Regulations, 2018 for alleged violation of Regulation 10(m) of the Custom Broker Licensing Regulations, 2018 on the facts of the case is sustainable.

Analysis: The adjudication under challenge relates solely to confirmation of violation of Regulation 10(m) based on findings in the inquiry report; other charges under Regulation 10(d), 10(e), 10(i), 10(q) and 13(2) were dropped by the adjudicating authority. The impugned penalty was imposed on the premise that the broker was aware of conflicting sale contracts and facilitated obtaining NOC for return of goods despite changes in import policy. The Tribunal examined the sequence of communications, the adjudicating authority's lenient treatment of the importer (including permission to re-export) and the linkage between the dropped charges and the sustaining of Charge 4 under Regulation 10(m). The Tribunal found that the foundation for confirming Regulation 10(m) was not sustained on record and that the Commissioner had concurrently dropped the primary charges upon which the finding under Regulation 10(m) rested.

Conclusion: The imposition of penalty of Rs.10,000/- under Regulation 18 of the Custom Broker Licensing Regulations, 2018 for alleged violation of Regulation 10(m) of the Custom Broker Licensing Regulations, 2018 is set aside and the appeal is allowed with consequential relief, if any, as per law.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the foundational findings on which a disciplinary charge is based are not sustained and related charges are dropped, a consequential penalty imposed for the related regulation cannot be sustained.

---