Misuse of Import Export Code upheld as rendering imports liable to confiscation; penalties sustained on admitted lending of IEC.

Voluntary admission that an IEC was lent for monetary consideration satisfies elements of confiscation liability and false-declaration offences: allowing third parties to use an IEC renders imported goods liable to confiscation under the Customs statutory scheme and amounts to knowingly enabling false or incorrect trade documentation. The analysis applies Section 112(a) and Section 114AA principles alongside FT(DR)A/Rules and Foreign Trade Policy limits on IEC use, treating un-retracted admissions as proof of knowledge and intent. Operative effect: penalties for permitting use of an IEC were sustained and the monetary penalty affirmed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the penalties imposed under Section 112(a) and Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on an IEC holder who admitted to lending his Import Export Code for monetary consideration, but who disclaimed involvement in misdeclaration or import transactions, are valid.

Analysis: Section 112(a) penalizes acts or omissions rendering imported goods liable to confiscation under Section 111. Section 114AA penalizes knowingly or intentionally making, signing or using declarations or documents which are false or incorrect in any material particular for purposes of the Act. Section 7 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 read with Rule 12 of the Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rules, 1993 and relevant Foreign Trade Policy provisions restrict use of an IEC to the allotted holder. The appellant made a voluntary admission that he had allowed his IEC to be used by others and had procured an IEC for an employee to be similarly used. That admission, un-retracted and voluntary, establishes that the IEC was lent for monetary benefit and was used by third parties to effect imports which rendered the goods liable to confiscation. Admissions can form the basis for penal liability where they show knowledge or intent to enable the prohibited use. The tribunal applied these statutory provisions to the appellant's admitted conduct and found the elements of Sections 112(a) and 114AA satisfied.

Conclusion: Penalties under Section 112(a) and Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 are upheld against the appellant for having knowingly allowed use of his Import Export Code; the appeal is dismissed and the penalty of Rs.25,00,000 stands confirmed.

---