1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Limitation period reckoning: time spent pursuing the writ petition to be counted, and appeal filing permitted.</h1> Petitioner was permitted to file an appeal to the tribunal because the tribunal's e hearing infrastructure is operational and defects-scrutiny has ... Permission to file appeal - exclusion of time spent in pursuing petition for limitation - virtual/e court enabled functioning of the tribunal - HELD THAT:- The time spent in pursuing the present petition be taken into account in case if the issue of limitation is to be reckoned. The time spent in pursuing the present petition be taken into account in case if the issue of limitation is to be reckoned. Issues: (i) Whether the petitioner should be permitted to file an appeal before the tribunal; (ii) Whether the time spent in pursuing the writ petition should be taken into account for the purpose of limitation for filing the appeal.Issue (i): Whether the petitioner should be permitted to file an appeal before the tribunal.Analysis: The Court noted that the tribunal's IT infrastructure has been put in place and hearings are being conducted in a virtual/e-court enabled mode with stabilized systems and scrutiny/marking of defects having commenced; on that basis the Court considered allowing the petitioner to proceed to file the appeal.Conclusion: Permission granted to the petitioner to file the appeal.Issue (ii): Whether the time spent in pursuing the writ petition should be taken into account for the purpose of limitation for filing the appeal.Analysis: The Court directed that the period consumed in prosecuting the writ petition shall be taken into account if limitation is to be reckoned for filing the appeal, thereby addressing the relevance of that period to any limitation objection.Conclusion: The time spent in pursuing the writ petition shall be taken into account for limitation purposes in filing the appeal.Final Conclusion: The petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file the appeal and directing that time spent in the writ petition be reckoned for limitation purposes; the petition and any pending applications stand disposed of.