https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787177 Petitioner was permitted to file an appeal to the tribunal because the tribunal's e hearing infrastructure is operational and defects-scrutiny has commenced, enabling effective adjudication; permission to prosecute the appeal was therefore granted. The court directed that the period spent prosecuting the writ petition shall be reckoned for purposes of limitation when considering any limitation objection to the appeal. The petition and pending applications were disposed of on those terms, allowing the appeal to proceed with the writ prosecution period counted for limitation reckoning. en-us Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Feb 2026 08:36:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787177 Petitioner was permitted to file an appeal to the tribunal because the tribunal's e hearing infrastructure is operational and defects-scrutiny has commenced, enabling effective adjudication; permission to prosecute the appeal was therefore granted. The court directed that the period spent prosecuting the writ petition shall be reckoned for purposes of limitation when considering any limitation objection to the appeal. The petition and pending applications were disposed of on those terms, allowing the appeal to proceed with the writ prosecution period counted for limitation reckoning. Case-Laws GST Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787177