Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the impugned Order-in-Original dated 19 April 2024 and the rectification order dated 9/10 July 2024 are non-speaking, mechanically passed orders in violation of the principles of natural justice and therefore liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The impugned orders were examined on the limited question of whether they contain reasoned findings addressing the submissions and documents placed on record. The orders record only bald statements that the office has gone through the taxpayer's submission and that relevant documents were not produced, confirm liability and direct recovery under the relevant provisions of the GST laws, without dealing with individual contentions or explaining the basis for rejecting the submissions. The rectification order merely upheld the earlier order without independent reasoning. The applicable legal framework requires reasoned, speaking orders and opportunity for hearing before raising tax demands. Mechanical confirmation of liability without specific, intelligible findings causes prejudice and hardship and impairs the right to be heard.
Conclusion: The impugned Order-in-Original dated 19 April 2024 and the rectification order dated 9/10 July 2024 are quashed for being non-speaking and in violation of principles of natural justice; the respondents are directed to issue a fresh show cause notice, grant personal hearing and pass detailed speaking orders; coercive action is stayed until fresh orders are passed.