Concessional import benefit for relay parts confirmed where finished devices perform protective functions, not automatic regulation, so benefit allowed.

Whether imported components qualify as parts of relays for concessional import under Notification No.25/1999-Cus was decided by applying the technical and tariff criteria distinguishing Chapter 8536 relays from Chapter 9032 automatic regulating instruments; the principle applied was that heading 9032 requires continuous measurement and regulation (measuring, comparator/control and start/stop function) whereas the devices here perform primary protective functions (tripping, monitoring, event recording, communications). Procedural approvals and periodic bond cancellations were noted. Outcome: imported parts held to be parts of relays eligible for the concession and appeals allowed with remand for consequential decision.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant is entitled to the benefit of Notification No.25/1999-Cus dated 28.02.1999 (Sl. No.112) for imported parts declared as parts of relays and used in the manufacture of finished goods classified and cleared as relays under Chapter sub-heading 85364100 / 85364900 for the relevant period; and whether the finished products (IEDs) supplied by the appellant are properly classifiable under Chapter sub-heading 9032 such that the concession is inapplicable.

Analysis: The Tribunal examined (i) the terms of Notification No.25/1999-Cus and the Customs (Import of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty for Manufacture of Excisable Goods) Rules, 1996 including the procedural approvals and periodic bond cancellations; (ii) the HSN Explanatory Notes and technical definitions for Chapter 85 (relays) and Chapter 90.32 (automatic regulating or controlling instruments) and the criteria required to attract heading 9032 (presence of measuring device, control device that compares actual and desired values and a starting/stopping device); (iii) technical literature and catalogues for the REL670/REL650 series showing the devices are designed fundamentally for protection of electrical systems with ancillary monitoring, communication and control features oriented to secure tripping and system protection rather than continuous regulation to bring and maintain a variable at a desired value; and (iv) Board circulars and precedents distinguishing multifunctional protection devices from controllers that satisfy Chapter 9032 criteria. The Tribunal found that the devices, though multifunctional and containing microprocessor-based features, perform primary protective functions (tripping, monitoring, event recording, communications) and do not operate as automatic regulators that continuously measure and regulate a parameter to a set value as contemplated by heading 9032. The Tribunal also considered the longstanding procedural approvals, periodic cancellation of bonds after use reports, and that classification of the manufactured finished goods as relays had not been disputed by Central Excise authorities during the relevant period, concluding that the dispute was fundamentally one of eligibility under the concessional notification rather than a pure reclassification for past consignments.

Conclusion: The Tribunal held that the finished products manufactured and cleared by the appellant are relays within Chapter sub-heading 8536 (specifically 85364100 / 85364900) for the relevant period and that the imported parts qualify as "parts of relays" eligible for benefit under Notification No.25/1999-Cus (Sl. No.112). The Tribunal set aside the impugned Order-in-Appeal dated 01.03.2018 and allowed the appeals with consequential relief, and remanded the related appeal E/26173/2013 to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision in light of these observations.

---