Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported general purpose inverters were classifiable under Heading 90.32 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as automatic regulators of electrical quantities, or under Heading 85.04 as inverters.
Analysis: The classification depended on the goods' configuration, function, and technical characteristics. The lower appellate authority relied on detailed technical literature and expert opinions from professors of electrical engineering, and found that the goods were programmable, capable of converting AC to DC and DC to AC, and able to automatically control electrical quantities such as stall prevention. The Department did not produce rebuttal evidence to dislodge that technical finding. The distinction drawn was that a mere inverter would fall under Heading 85.04, but the imported equipment had additional control functions bringing it within Heading 90.32.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under Heading 90.32 and not Heading 85.04; the Revenue's challenge failed.