Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the distributor control systems manufactured by the respondent were classifiable under Chapter Heading 9032.80 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or under Chapter Heading 8537 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: The Board's Circular distinguished between programmable logic controllers and programmable process controllers. The goods were shown to be used for controlling industrial processes such as pressure and temperature. The expert opinions and the material placed by the respondent supported the view that the goods functioned as programmable process controllers. The appellate order was found to be detailed and reasoned, and the competing goods of other manufacturers were also classified under Chapter Heading 9032.80.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading 9032.80 and not under Chapter Heading 8537. The Revenue's appeal failed.