Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the protective additions made under Section 68 and Section 69C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the hands of an assessee alleged to be an accommodation entry provider can be sustained where substantive additions have been made and confirmed in the hands of beneficiary entities.
Analysis: Applicable legal framework requires the assessee in whose books a credit appears to discharge the primary onus under Section 68 by establishing (i) identity of the creditor, (ii) creditworthiness of the creditor, and (iii) genuineness of the transaction. Search-derived material and sworn statements indicating that the assessee operated as a conduit for accommodation entries are relevant to the assessment of whether the statutory onus was discharged. Protective additions under Section 68 and consequential protective addition under Section 69C are not negated merely because substantive additions against beneficiaries have been made; the liability under Section 68 attaches independently to the assessee if the statutory onus is not met. Where discrepancies in quantum are raised, verification of correct figures is appropriate but does not preclude restoration of additions if onus is not established.
Conclusion: Protective additions under Section 68 and the consequential addition under Section 69C are restored and sustained; the order deleting those protective additions is set aside and the Revenue's appeal is allowed.