<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 262 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786067</link>
    <description>The primary issue is unexplained credits treated as accommodation entries: the assessee bears the initial burden to prove identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of creditors, and cannot rely solely on ledger reflection; consequence - additions treated as substantive are maintainable where search material and statements show conduit activity. The secondary issue is survival of protective additions when beneficiaries face substantive additions: the liability for unexplained credits is independent and protective deletions cannot be preserved merely because beneficiaries were assessed; consequence - protective additions are restored and consequential additions for routed cash transactions are upheld in favour of revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 09:16:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 262 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786067</link>
      <description>The primary issue is unexplained credits treated as accommodation entries: the assessee bears the initial burden to prove identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of creditors, and cannot rely solely on ledger reflection; consequence - additions treated as substantive are maintainable where search material and statements show conduit activity. The secondary issue is survival of protective additions when beneficiaries face substantive additions: the liability for unexplained credits is independent and protective deletions cannot be preserved merely because beneficiaries were assessed; consequence - protective additions are restored and consequential additions for routed cash transactions are upheld in favour of revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>