Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Seized gold jewellery refund claim: market-value payment ordered and costs for delay imposed after disposal without notice</h1> Petition challenges disposal of seized gold jewellery without intimation and alleges breach of natural justice; Court found the goods effectively ... Seeking refund at market value of money in lieu of gold jewellery - Disposal of seized goods without intimation and breach of natural justice - The subject gold jewellery items in effect have been completely confiscated, seized and destroyed by the Customs Department without complying with even the basic principles of natural justice. - HC held that- This Court directs that the Petitioner shall now be paid the market rate of the gold prevalent today for 1110 grams. The value of the gold at today’s market rate shall be paid within a period of one month. If the amount is not paid within the period of one month, further costs of Rs.1 lakh would be liable to be paid by the Customs Department to the Petitioner. HELD THAT:- We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Outcome: Special Leave Petition dismissed [No detailed order].
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
