https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785860 Seized gold jewellery was disposed of without intimation, leading to alleged confiscation and destruction without compliance with natural justice. The High Court directed payment of the gold's market value at the prevailing rate for 1,110 grams within one month, with additional costs if payment was delayed. The Supreme Court noted no reason to interfere in exercise of Article 136 jurisdiction and left the High Court's order undisturbed, resulting in dismissal of the special leave petition. en-us Fri, 23 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785860 Seized gold jewellery was disposed of without intimation, leading to alleged confiscation and destruction without compliance with natural justice. The High Court directed payment of the gold's market value at the prevailing rate for 1,110 grams within one month, with additional costs if payment was delayed. The Supreme Court noted no reason to interfere in exercise of Article 136 jurisdiction and left the High Court's order undisturbed, resulting in dismissal of the special leave petition. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 23 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785860