Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether Tendofit, imported in bulk as a composite preparation, was classifiable under Chapter 21 as a food preparation or under Chapter 39 as a natural polymer; (ii) Whether Mobilee, imported in bulk as a composite preparation, was classifiable under Chapter 21 as a food preparation or under Chapter 39 as a natural polymer; (iii) Whether GG Orosoluble was classifiable under Chapter 21 as a food preparation or under Chapter 30 as a probiotic / culture of micro-organisms.
Issue (i): Whether Tendofit, imported in bulk as a composite preparation, was classifiable under Chapter 21 as a food preparation or under Chapter 39 as a natural polymer.
Analysis: Classification was required to be determined on the condition of the goods at the time of import. Tendofit was imported in bulk and was not shown to be edible in the form imported. The department led no chemical test or other reliable evidence to establish that it was a food preparation at import stage. Applying the General Rules for Interpretation, the composite product had to be classified by its essential character. On the evidence, the mucopolysaccharide / chondroitin sulphate component imparted the essential character, and the material was supported by expert opinion and persuasive foreign tariff rulings.
Conclusion: Tendofit was correctly classifiable under Chapter 39 and not under Chapter 21.
Issue (ii): Whether Mobilee, imported in bulk as a composite preparation, was classifiable under Chapter 21 as a food preparation or under Chapter 39 as a natural polymer.
Analysis: Mobilee was imported in bulk and was required to be formulated before it became suitable for consumption. Its composition showed sodium hyaluronate as the dominant component, with polysaccharides and collagen also present. The department did not discharge the burden of proving that the imported goods were edible at the time of import or that Chapter 21 was attracted. On application of the rule of essential character, sodium hyaluronate was held to be the component giving the product its character, and the expert opinion on record supported the classification under Chapter 39.
Conclusion: Mobilee was correctly classifiable under Chapter 39 and not under Chapter 21.
Issue (iii): Whether GG Orosoluble was classifiable under Chapter 21 as a food preparation or under Chapter 30 as a probiotic / culture of micro-organisms.
Analysis: GG Orosoluble was shown to be a probiotic culture of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG imported as raw material grade product requiring further processing before becoming fit for consumption. The excipients were for stability during storage and transport, not to convert it into a food preparation. No contrary technical or chemical evidence was produced by the department to displace the expert opinion relied upon by the importer. The record supported treatment of the product as a culture of micro-organisms rather than as an edible preparation under Chapter 21.
Conclusion: GG Orosoluble was correctly classifiable under Chapter 30 and not under Chapter 21.
Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the importer was upheld for all the disputed goods, and the customs demand, interest, and penalties based on the contrary classification could not survive.
Ratio Decidendi: Customs classification must be determined from the condition of the goods at the time of import, and where a composite product is involved, the classification turns on its essential character; the revenue bears the burden of proving a rival classification with convincing evidence.