TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court upholds classification of aluminum casseroles under Heading 76.15, rejecting revenue's argument.</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE Versus HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD.</h3> The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the classification of aluminum casseroles as per Heading 76.15, considering their common parlance and ... Classification of goods - aluminum casseroles manufactured with the aid of aluminum foils - to be classified as “containers”, falling in Chapter Heading 76.12 or as classifiable as aluminum trays - HELD THAT:- Having considered the orders of the CESTAT, this Court is of the opinion that the view expressed by the Tribunal is correct. On an application of the common parlance test also having regard to the use of the products, (i.e. storing articles of food) and the explanatory note to the HSN, there can be no conclusion other than that arrived at by the CESTAT i.e. the goods are classifiable under Heading 76.15. The appeals are, therefore, dismissed. The Supreme Court of India dismissed the appeal regarding the classification of aluminum casseroles as containers or trays. The court upheld the classification of the casseroles under Heading 76.15 based on the common parlance test and use of the products for storing food articles. The revenue's contention that the casseroles were containers under Chapter Heading 76.12 was rejected.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
