Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisional order under section 263 was validly made on the ground that the Assessing Officer failed to enquire into the sale of lands and their character as capital assets within the municipal limits of Bilaspur.
Analysis: The assessee had sold three properties at Bodri, Bilaspur, but the assessment order dealt only with cash deposits and contained no enquiry or finding on the land transactions. The revisional authority recorded that the municipal boundary of Bilaspur had been extended by the relevant notification, and that the lands fell within the municipal limits and therefore constituted capital assets within section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. In such circumstances, the omission to examine the capital-gains consequence rendered the assessment order erroneous in so far as it was prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. The absence of enquiry and verification brought the case within the scope of section 263, including the deeming effect of Explanation 2.
Conclusion: The revisional order was upheld and the challenge to it failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessment is completed without making enquiries on a material issue that has tax consequences, the order is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue and is liable to revision under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.