TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT Grants Partial Waiver of Predeposit for Service Tax Appeal</h1> <h3>ETA Constructions (India) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai</h3> ETA Constructions (India) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai - [2010] 26 STT 439 (CHENNAI - CESTAT), 2010 (18) S.T.R. 420 (Tri. - Chennai) Issues: Application for waiver of predeposit of service tax and interest for the period 10-9-2004 to 1-6-2007 under 'Commercial or Industrial Construction Services'.In the judgment delivered by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI, the issue of waiver of predeposit of service tax and interest for the period 10-9-2004 to 1-6-2007 under the category of 'Commercial or Industrial Construction Services' was considered. The Tribunal allowed the application for waiver as the applicants demonstrated a prima facie case that they had entered into works contracts subject to taxation only from 1-6-2007. This decision was based on precedents set by the Tribunal in cases like Build Craft Interior (P.) Ltd. v. CST and Ocen Interiors (P.) Ltd. v. CST. However, for the subsequent period, the applicants failed to establish a prima facie case for waiver. It was noted that the applicants were not engaged in constructing residential complexes with more than 12 units, and even if they were, the construction was intended for personal use by the Central Government and Defence department, thus falling outside the definition of a 'residential complex.' The total demand for the post-1-6-2007 period was estimated to be around Rs. 28 lakhs, and the Tribunal directed a pre-deposit of this amount within 8 weeks. Upon compliance with this direction, the pre-deposit of the remaining tax, interest, and penalty would be waived, and the recovery stayed during the appeal process. Failure to adhere to this directive would result in the vacation of the stay and dismissal of the appeal without prior notice.
TaxTMI 