Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the adjudged service tax, interest and penalty pending disposal of the appeals.
Analysis: The appellants established a prima facie case by relying on Tribunal decisions holding that activity covered by the later works contract category could not be taxed under an earlier category for the prior period, and that a works contract could not be vivisected for service tax purposes. The disputed demand also turned on denial of the abatement under the exemption notification, but the record disclosed sufficient prima facie support for the appellants' contention that the taxed activity was part of a works contract not exigible during the material period. In these circumstances, the balance of convenience warranted protection against coercive recovery pending appeal.
Conclusion: Complete waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the adjudged dues was stayed pending disposal of the appeals.